No le tomo más de una semana para este editorial del Village Voice en torno a su escritor que aparenta estar plagado de conflictos de intereses...La decisión del Village, como lee el editoral, es para no dar la impresión errónea e incomodar a sus lectores...A eso yo le llamo respeto al público. También se le llama "Politica Editorial," o "Reglamento."
Cuántos años lleva el Día ignorando los reclamos de los lectores de la sección cultural?
Porqué todavía no se contrata a un crítico full time? y Si lo hacen recuerden leerle la cartilla.
Editor’s Statement on Art Critic Christian Viveros-Fauné
by Tony Ortega
January 19th, 2008 3:10 PM
"Since the departure of Jerry Saltz last March, the Voice has been assigning art reviews to several critics, all of whom work for us on a part-time, freelance basis. Each of them makes a living outside the Voice, and we discuss with them the nature of their non-Voice activities to ensure that they don’t conflict with their reviewing duties. One of our reviewers is former art gallery owner Christian Viveros-Fauné. It has been brought to our attention that Christian has been named managing director of two upcoming commercial art fairs, one in New York (Volta) and one in Chicago (Next). Christian assures us that the consulting work he is doing for those fairs does not conflict with anything he has written for us or would write in the future, and he has demonstrated to us that besides being an excellent and highly readable critic, he’s also a man of integrity. But we’re concerned that his work outside the Voice at least creates an appearance of conflict. While Christian says that the art at the New York galleries he critiques is in a separate sphere from the type of art that would appear in the fairs, we don’t want to put a reviewer in a situation that calls for an ethical juggling act. Since Christian has made it clear that he will continue to fill out the terms of his art-fair contract, we wish him great success, thank him for the excellent work he has done, and feel disappointment that he will cease writing for us."
"For most litigants, however, the ruling seems to reinforce the sensible view that a defendant should not waste its time with a 12(b)(6) motion on fair use unless its 'aesthetic alterations' to the plaintiff's work are immediately apparent and compelling." - Bob Clarida and Robert Bernstein in the NYLJ [$] on Richard Prince's latest.